Monday, December 21, 2009

Palm oil millers can help solve Sabah power shortage

By Ooi Tee Ching
bt@nstp.com.my
2009/12/21

SABAH'S power shortage can be mitigated if the government provides better incentives for palm oil millers to generate renewable energy.

There are 410 palm oil mills in the country, of which 117 are in Sabah. Mills emit methane from retention ponds after oil extraction.

"Estate owners can trap methane from the mill sludge to fuel up steam turbines and generate electricity, a renewable source of clean energy," said Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) chairman Datuk Sabri Ahmad.

"This is one of the cleaner alternatives for Sabah, instead of installing coal-fired power plants. Biomass and biogas technology is available now," he told Business Times in an interview in Petaling Jaya, Selangor.

"What we need is some financial assistance. Millers need around RM6 million to install methane gas trapping and steam turbine generators," he said.

From January 2010, the Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water pledged to facilitate RM1.5 billion worth of cheap loans via local banks for the provision and usage of green technologies.

"Relatively cheap loans is a good start but matching grants can make a difference in solving Sabah's power shortage," he added.

Currently, utility giant Tenaga Nasional Bhd via its "Small Renewable Energy Programme" is offering to buy renewable energy at only 21sen/KWh. Another stumbling block is the lack of connectivity between neighbouring mills to the national grid.

"If the government were to fund the hook-up and raise the price to 30sen/KWh, we can quickly realise this initiative among palm oil millers to benefit neighbouring rural communities," Sabri said.

A good role model is TSH Resources Bhd. Since 2005, it has been turning dirty methane gas emitted by its mills to clean energy. TSH's mills generate 14 megawatts (MW), of which they sell 10MW back to Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd and keep 4MW for its own use.

Methane is one of the many polluting gas in the environment that contributes to global warming and depletion of the ozone layer. Therefore, methane gas trapping and electricity generation is an environmental-friendly initiative.

Next year the European Union (EU), a major biofuels consumer, will impose a target to only accept biodiesel that can reduce carbon dioxide emissions by at least 35 per cent versus fossil fuel, which risks cutting out palm oil which the EU considers to save only 19 per cent.

Sabri, who have just returned from Brussels, said the European Commission's Joint Research Centre - the scientific body responsible for the scientific and technical aspects of EU policy development - is likely to show higher savings for palm oil.

"Having received our latest data gathered from 102 estates in Malaysia, the JRC (scientists) say palm oil could show savings of more than 19 per cent," Sabri said.

http://bit.ly/211209MPOB

7 comments:

zack68 said...

Things to ponder
For a 300 MW Power Plant:
Estimated COAL requirement is 858,000 ton per year.
Estimated EFB requirement is 9,450,000 ton per year.
This means that for the plant to operate 24/7, by using the conventional 10 ton lorry, a total of 113 trips of EFB per hour is required. (is this possible?)

kitakita said...

Kalau betullah kenyataan 'Zack68' tu tentang coal dan efb tu.....emmm macam susah untuk direalisasikan. My concern is to provide 9,450,000 EFB maka penebangan hutan pun lebih berleluasa...dan bila permintaan terhadap EFB ni untuk run energy...maka keperluan untuk lebih banyak pokok sawit untuk menghasil EFB juga sangat tinggi. So apa rasionalnya guna oil palm biomass ni yang dianggap 'GREEN' dan dalam masa yang sama 'semakin banyaklah penebangan hutan berlaku?? Kalau pun no more forest land dibuka untuk sawit...my question is, it only apply for primary forest. So how about secondary forest? So GREEN is what terms?????

roxy said...

I don't think there is enough Palm Oil waste to be used for this power plant, there is no point to use palm oil waste if it means chopping down trees for Oil palm plantations. Why can't we use solar power instead? We have sunlight all year round.

Boten_Trish said...

@roxy: Solar power? That depends on the season. If it's monsoon, you won't get enough sunlight. But I like you idea. Don't we have any natural gas? How about using that instead? I think we need more R&D to find alternatives.

Paquin said...

Saya tak pakar sangat la pasal cara2 selesaikan masalah bekalan elektrik ni. Kalau saya pakar dah lama saya bg jalan yg paling best tp......

So bagi saya, asalkan masalah bekalan elektrik dapat diselesaiakn, itu sudah cukup baik :)

kitakita said...

Adalah sukar untuk merealisasikan penggunaan oil palm biomass ni dalam menghasilkan tenaga elektrik di Sabah ni. Namun saya amat menyokong langkah-langkah ini untuk menambah keperluan tenaga elektrik di Sabah. Cuma cadangan saya agar semua kilang-kilang kelapa sawit di Sabah dapat menghasilkan tenaga sendiri tanpa perlu bersaing dengan keperluan elektrik orang-orang awam di seluruh negeri. Kalau setiap kilang mampu memaksimakan penggunaan kelapa sawit.....konsep kelestarian dapat dijamin dan ia menunjukkan sistem pengurusan kilang sawit yang cekap di Sabah.

roxy said...

I read an article sometimes ago, it mentioned that German are using Solar power even though there are significantly less sunlight than Sabah. Although they still have to rely on other methods. But there is no reason why we cannot implement two or more methods of generating powers. I'm in favor of the solar power and wind turbines.